O.K. So.... Its like this right... Niel Gaiman's T.V. adaptation of Good Omens, is Fantastic... Brilliant... I could pile superlatives on it for quite a while. I loved it. Now I hasten to add... this isn't a 'review'. At least... not in the ordinary sense of the word. 'Reaction' would be a better description. And... that said... I am a little biased... because I have loved the book since it was first published. And... as anyone who knows me, knows (brd) I am a huge fan of Terry Pratchett, one of my all time favourite people. Never mind author. In a lot of ways the experience reminded me of seeing Jackson's Fellowship of the Ring for the first time. Likewise I loved it, but when it was done... I missed Tom, and Old man Willow. And now... dear reader, if you don't wan't spoilers, would be a good time to postpone reading further.* And with Good Omens I missed, Big Ted, Pigbog, Greaser and Scuzz, AKA Grievous Bodily Harm....
Popular posts from this blog
OK. Part of what is going on for me right now is trying to be visible. In childhood being invisible was the thing. The key to being safe is often being invisible. But invisible people are not worried about. Transgendered people are attacked all the time. Being visible is important. Quentin Crisp and countless others have shown us this. But secrets are hard habits to break. And they become simply secrets by habit. "I try real hard to be who I am, but everybody wants you to be like them," in the words of Mr Bob Dylan.. Nobel lauriet and all that. So I'm getting older now, and life is catching up with me, and I think to myself if this part of me is not a part of everything, then it will vanish as I vanish. If I keep it secret in any context it is invisible. I make myself invisible. So I will not choose vidtimhood. I am a visible tranny. I just wish I hadn't made sure there are no pictures of me through my early adult years. I was cuter then, young fresh...
If we Suppose....
If we suppose, that there is a 'sum total' of all existence. Which supposes that the cosmos is finite. Which of course it might not be.....Many physcisists do disagree. (Seriously they do, always falling out that lot) Then: what does this mean? The cosmos has a begining and end? Yet the theist will say, "No! it cannot be..... something must be eternal!" Why? I will agree, the cosmos does seem to be eternal. If we are to think correct, Penrose, Kaku, Carrol and the others. And I can see no good reason to doubt them But there is no logical reason we should imagine, an 'infinite regression of cause' should be named 'god', for arbritary reasons. We have no reason to think an infinite regression of cause, should represent consciousness. Life, intelligent life, Humans, minds, consciousness are trivial things, with no logical reason for a 'designer. No evidence consciousness is not just an emergent property of matter. An inevitab...
Comments
Post a Comment